Remote

Boud

@boud@framapiaf.org

mastodon 4.6.9

cosmologiste; en faveur de l'accès ouvert au savoir et des prises de décisions publiques structurées, libres et informées

#LogicielLibre #FreeSoftware #Debian #Mobian #cosmology #OpenScience #HumanRights (#fedi22)

711 Followers

154 Following

50 Posts

Joined April 07, 2019

recherche:

https://cosmo.torun.pl/~boud

logiciels libres:

#logiciellibre #debian

recherche:

#cosmology #openscience

git repository:

https://codeberg.org/boud

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 2mo ago

@nek@hear-me.social #PamDuress [1] is a small #LGPL package, looks serious and well-written, developed since 2021, though should be checked by people with infosec experience. Fork for #phosh [2]. Up to the user to write or choose "duress" scripts - not necessarily deleting anything - could be emailing an alert or audio/photo files to a trusted address. Should be usable on any GNU/Linux desktop/laptop/phone for people whose threat model needs this. [1] https://github.com/nuvious/pam-duress [2] https://github.com/Sirr-OS/phosh-pam-duress

GitHub - nuvious/pam-duress: A Pluggable Authentication Module (PAM) which allows the establishment of alternate passwords that can be used to perform actions to clear sensitive data, notify IT/Security staff, close off sensitive network connections, etc

A Pluggable Authentication Module (PAM) which allows the establishment of alternate passwords that can be used to perform actions to clear sensitive data, notify IT/Security staff, close off sensit...

4

0

2

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 2mo ago

Replying to

@anne_twain@theblower.au Active Wikipedians can sign willingness to do an editorial strike [1], if requested to by WWU. There's also a petition (effectively) requesting the #WMF Board of Trustees to instruct the CEO to voluntarily recognise #WWU [2], and a more generic solidarity with @wwu@social.wikiworkersunited.org petition at [3]. @josephcox@infosec.exchange [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wiki_Workers_United_solidarity [2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/2026_recognize_Wiki_Workers_United_petition [3] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_Workers_United#External_links

en.wikipedia.org

3

0

2

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 2mo ago

#WikimediaFoundation had a deadline of 24 July 2026 to voluntarily recognise #WikiWorkersUnitedUS [1], the newly created union of #WMF employees in the US. On 27 July, WMF replied "No!" [2], with "an incredibly disappointing statement" and an FAQ that "might as well have been pulled directly from a UnionBusting 101 handbook" [3] and "reek[s] of #UnionBusting disinformation" [3], per community analysis. @wwu@social.wikiworkersunited.org [1] https://wikiworkersunited.org/announcements/2026-07-20-us-demands-voluntary-recognition [2] https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/2026/07/27/statement-cwa-recognition-request [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28WMF%29#Recent_questions_about_the_Foundation_and_US_unionization_request

wikiworkersunited.org

2

0

2

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 3mo ago

Replying to

@alicetragedy@mastodon.social The #EuropeanTradeUnionConfederation #ETUC [1] called for EU-wide working temperature regulations in July 2022 [2]. Existing rules cited for BE+HU+LV+SI+ES (+ME non-EU). [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Trade_Union_Confederation [2] https://www.etuc.org/en/pressrelease/climate-crisis-requires-eu-law-maximum-working-temperatures

en.wikipedia.org

4

0

3

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 2mo ago

Replying to

@Walrus@toot.wales @henryk@chaos.social Per #MadeleineRogers [1], the abuse of procedures like fast-tracking is a component of #DemocraticBacksliding that is "buried in confusing complexities that are difficult for non-experts to disentangle,... outside of the attention of the general public". Rogers gives an analysis + specific suggestions [1] of how to improve #DemocraticResilience [2] before it's too late. Not easy because of the complexity, but doable. [1] https://www.idea.int/sites/default/files/2026-04/parliamentary-rules-in-democratic-backsliding-resilient-design.pdf [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_resilience#Parliamentary_procedure

2

1

0

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 5mo ago

Replying to

@wobweger One research community that I'm in switched to #Visio ( #FOSS ), after I commented, https://visio.numerique.gouv.fr Hope alone won't have much effect: respond to your colleagues by briefly presenting the evidence, summarising both the ethics and the practical consequences, and you may find that consensus *may* evolve beyond the #TyrannyOfConvenience . One person speaking up may not have an immediate effect, but will break the illusion that consent to abuse is unanimous. @koen_hufkens

visio.numerique.gouv.fr

Visio

4

0

2

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 6mo ago

Replying to

@quarknova I completely agree. This is not just excellent news for en.Wikipedia, it's also a symbol of holding to a high intellectual standard for other communities, many who are tempted by #TyrannyOfConvenience arguments.

4

0

0

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 4mo ago

Replying to

@albertcardona@mathstodon.xyz #Bixonimania on Wikipedia + Wikidata: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bixonimania https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q138993989

en.wikipedia.org

2

0

0

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 5mo ago

Replying to

@WilmBoerhout@mathstodon.xyz @Migueldeicaza@mastodon.social To see a more complete #AmIUnique parameter list: https://amiunique.org/fingerprint

My Fingerprint- Am I Unique ?

Check if your browser has a unique fingerprint, how identifiable you are on the Internet

2

0

1

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 8mo ago

Replying to

@bjb @benroyce I don't know if anyone from the #CrowdCountingConsortium at #HarvardUni is on Fedi (they should be), but you can submit reports on US protest crowd counts to the Consortium through a #GAFAM link provided at: https://ash.harvard.edu/programs/crowd-counting-consortium This is useful empirical research.

ash.harvard.edu

5

0

4

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 6mo ago

Replying to

@HowTheyVoteEU @aetios @Tutanota Looks like you need to find the "Amendments" section at top of [1] to find Amendment 34 (Am 34) [2], which passed by 307 vs 306. IIUC, Am 34 put strong restrictions requiring specific justification to justify spying, and forbidding spying that bypasses E2EE. IIUC, if the vote on the overall Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 had passed, then thanks to Am 34, the regulation would have hypothetically been weakened. [1] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-10-2026-0040_EN.html [2] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-10-2026-0040-AM-004-006_EN.pdf

europarl.europa.eu

3

0

0

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 5mo ago

Looks like [1] #Hungary will cancel its #ICCWithdrawal before the current withdrawal notification becomes effective, and will respect its obligation to arrest any #ICCFugitives , charged by the #InternationalCriminalCourt (#ICC) with #WarCrime s, #CrimesAgainstHumanity and/or #Genocide [2], that enter its territory. #RodrigoDuterte is already in The Hague going through his trial procedures.

#Netanyahu #Putin #LvovaBelova #DavidSanakoev

[1] https://www.politico.eu/article/peter-magyar-hungary-would-arrest-benjamin-netanyahu-israel

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_indicted_in_the_International_Criminal_Court

2

0

6

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 5mo ago

Replying to

@blindcoder@toot.berlin @fsfe@mastodon.social Did we have this same poll recently?

2

2

0

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 5mo ago

Replying to

@netblocks@mastodon.social @i@toot.pouyan.net @robux4@rivals.space

Edits needed for this poll to get more yes/no answers on Fedi:

s/Mastodon/Fediverse/
s/platforms/instances/
s/suspend the accounts/suspend the accounts and defederate from instances/

Probably worth a new poll after this one closes, with a more meaningful question.

2

0

0

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 6mo ago

Replying to

@Mehrad@fosstodon.org To all my Fedi followers: #OpenTheIranianInternet should be an appeal that should be easy to find strong support for, from everyone except the #IRI/#IRGC . How about at least boosting the hashtag #OpenTheIranianInternet ? Or propose a better hashtag? Maybe an #OkoPress article @rysiek@mstdn.social ?

2

2

3

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 5mo ago

Replying to

@EUCommission@ec.social-network.europa.eu Please tell Von der Leyen that her suspension of the Google/Alphabet fine is not acceptable! @perjakobsen@mastodon.social @max_bank@eupolicy.social @rebalance_now@bewegung.social

1

0

0

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 5mo ago

Replying to

@Kathmandu Per both [1]+[2], the "live video frame visible to other meeting participants" is likely to be scanned too. There's no guarantee that refusal to buy an Orb camera and register your iris pattern will prevent Zoom from using the video data to store your eye scan. Using a low-resolution webcam will weaken the quality of your eye scans, but the cumulative data will still be rich; no webcam at all is the safest. @koen_hufkens [1] https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/17/zoom-teams-up-with-world-to-verify-humans-in-meeting [2] https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/zoom-will-now-check-if-you-are-a-human-or-an-ai-imposter-during-video-meetings

1

0

0

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 5mo ago

Replying to

@tek@todon.eu So the #PRChina government convinced #Zambia n authorities to sabotage #RightsCon2026 - for 2600 f2f participants and 1100 online participants - because PRChina wants to oppress #Taiwan (#RepublicOfChina). #StreisandEffect ? Sorry #XiJinPing, you can't do that sort of oppression quietly. #China https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China%E2%80%93Zambia_relations

en.wikipedia.org

1

0

2

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 5mo ago

Replying to

@Mehrad You have a much better perspective than I do to make those broad judgments about Pezeshkian; I can only point to the few bits of info that I see. The Rudaw source also quotes #SattarHashemi, Minister of ICT: "fair access to the internet is the right of all people". Is it actually the Ministry of ICT who controls the key internet nodes in a practical sense, not the #SupremeNationalSecurityCouncil (of which Pezeshkian is a member)? @NyxKai

1

2

0

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 5mo ago

Replying to

@Mehrad @NyxKai The #ReformistsFront also oppose tiered access. They seem to be an alliance of a mishmash of small political parties. Scroll down to the 7th item: https://web.archive.org/web/20260430101639/https://www.iranintl.com/en/liveblog/202604294038 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reformists_Front #IranianReformistsFront

Live - Trump says will keep Iran under blockade until it agrees to deal

web.archive.org

Live - Trump says will keep Iran under blockade until it agrees to deal

US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that Moscow shared Washington

1

1

0

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 5mo ago

Replying to

@Mehrad I only meant that with their *public* statements cited by Rudaw mid-April, Pezeshkian's associates *appear* to be siding with ordinary Iranians on this particular issue. I'm not generalising beyond that. That's also what I tried to imply by "independently of reform-vs-revolution debates". @NyxKai @rysiek

1

4

0

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 5mo ago

Replying to

@Mehrad @NyxKai It looks like there's a split on this between #Pezeshkian -aligned authorities versus #IRGC -aligned authorities - dating to around 22 April: https://www.rudaw.net/english/middleeast/iran/24042026 Independently of reform-vs-revolution debates (Pezeshkianists siding with ordinary Iranians on this issue), it is *really* important to show that Iranians and Iranian citizens' associations are continuing to coordinate and prefer to *refuse* tiered access rather than accept it as a temporary compromise. @rysiek

1

11

0

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 5mo ago

Replying to

@LaurentChemla Good explanation [1] including "For immediate mitigation" (consistent with most other descriptions on how to immediately prevent the exploit while waiting for your distribution to fix it properly). Debian security tracker [2]. #cve_2026_31431 #CVE_2026_31431 [1] https://xint.io/blog/copy-fail-linux-distributions [2] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2026-31431

1

0

1

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 5mo ago

Replying to

@UlrikeHahn worth a hashtag: #ParasocialMedia

1

0

0

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 5mo ago

Replying to

@sarahalang@fedihum.org @StefanMuelller@lingo.lol I'll just give the statistics (public info) at our place: 0/4 full professors are female; 4/7 university professors are female. The current rules for getting a professor title, which leads more or less automatically to getting a full professorship, have a key criterion of requiring two "outstanding" research achievements. It's up to five referees to interpret "outstanding" (and up to a committee to act on the referees' reports). The rules change each ~5-10 yrs.

1

0

0

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 6mo ago

Replying to

@Mehrad@fosstodon.org You're correct: there's no overt condemnation. I see only one sentence in [3] about the Internet. But I think we can *infer* that the block is part of "Blanket restrictions [that] are generally inconsistent with international human rights law". Politicians like @marinetondelier@piaille.fr @VoltEuropa@mstdn.social @marcel_kolaja@mastodon.pirati.cz - could you please urgently call for the IRI's internet blockade to be lifted? As @netblocks@mastodon.social says, this is "unprecedented in scale and duration for a connected society". @rysiek@mstdn.social

1

0

0

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 6mo ago

Replying to

@Mehrad@fosstodon.org OHCHR *does* object to the IRI internet block [3]. Per your "actual way forward ... to push governments", politicians on Fedi like @marinetondelier@piaille.fr @VoltEuropa@mstdn.social @marcel_kolaja@mastodon.pirati.cz may be motivated by ordinary Fedizens like me and you by comments, but also by numbers collected by petitions like the #Daadkhast one. Even the most ethical politicians need both qualitative and quantitative evidence of voters' wishes/evidence/arguments. @rysiek@mstdn.social [3] https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2026/04/turk-warns-deepening-clampdown-freedom-expression-across-middle-east

1

2

0

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 6mo ago

Replying to

@Mehrad@fosstodon.org @rysiek@mstdn.social My signature appeared. Currently 193 signatures.

1

2

0

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 6mo ago

Replying to

@ahltorp @kaika1975 https://citizens-initiative.europa.eu/how-it-works/faq_en "The Commission sends the signatures collected using its online collection system to the Member States via its file exchange service." As @alberto_cottica says, "those [of] us who are privileged enough to not worry about being repressed can pick up some slack for the others". And bureaucratic errors could lead to some wrong deletions, although you should store your hash string ("Signature identifier") for checking later in the "confirmed" list.

citizens-initiative.europa.eu

1

0

0

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 6mo ago

Replying to

Good to see that the tradition of #cosmologists having a broad view of the Earth-bound world is thriving. Two of #DavidWHogg 's #ArXiv_2602_10181 [1] overtly stated keywords:

"We beat ploughshares into swords" (p11)
"Astrophysics represents a borderless world" (p12) What responsibility comes in paradoxically doing both? (#Manicheism fails)

#MinasKaramanis #NatalieBHogg #RobertoTrotta #ArXiv_2602_10165 [2]

[1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.10181

[2] https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.10165

Why do we do astrophysics?

At time of writing, large language models (LLMs) are beginning to obtain the ability to design, execute, write up, and referee scientific projects on the data-science side of astrophysics. What implications does this have for our profession? In this white paper, I list - and argue for - a set of facts or "points of agreement" about what astrophysics is, or should be; these include considerations of novelty, people-centrism, trust, and (the lack of) clinical value. I then list and discuss

1

0

1

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 6mo ago

Replying to

@aral Sounds like the #BanalityOfEvil [1] - #HannahArendt [2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eichmann_in_Jerusalem#Banality_of_evil [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hannah_Arendt

en.wikipedia.org

1

1

0

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 6mo ago

Replying to

@nixCraft@mastodon.social Here's the #Debian #SystemDCensorD proposal, using D-Bus - "On installation, the user will be required to enter their location. ... This location and user data will be managed by a new daemon, systemd-censord, ... For example, ... a unit for China will implement keyword scans ... debian will need to switch to being a binary-only distribution ... with ... controls to prevent any non-signed software from being installed , written, or compiled, ..." @debian@framapiaf.org [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2026/03/msg00018.html

lists.debian.org

On the need for a censorship API for legal compliance reasons in some countries and U.S. states

1

1

1

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 6mo ago

Replying to

@decidim@freeradical.zone Open Source Politics = https://opensourcepolitics.eu

Accueil - Open Source Politics

Open Source Politics

Accueil - Open Source Politics

Depuis 2016 nous mettons en œuvre des outils numériques éthiques pour accompagner les démarches participatives qui ont du sens.

0

1

0

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 5mo ago

Replying to

@thecontinent@mas.to #Iran is welcomed to #TheContinent. +hashtags: #IranWar #2026IranWar #IranianJournalists #ScrollingWhileDriving

0

0

1

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 9mo ago

Replying to

@resuna Why get phased buy what's just a parsing faze?

0

0

0

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 6mo ago

Replying to

There's a serious-looking petition at #Daadkhast [1]. @Mehrad@fosstodon.org - does Daadkhast look like credible to you? I tried signing but so far got no email confirmation info, and my sig hasn't appeared (yet). Maybe there's manual checking to avoid spam/abuse. #Daadkhast does appear to have some role in #EuropeanParliament campaigning [2]. @rysiek@mstdn.social [1] https://www.daadkhast.org/en/petition/6360 [2] https://xcancel.com/ilhankyuchyuk/status/1494257274319257603

0

2

0

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 6mo ago

Replying to

@Mehrad@fosstodon.org This is something where cyberspace *might* help in terms of pressuring the media and governments. If you know of websites with petitions, or pressure-your-MEP/MP/member-of-Congress guides or similar, to #OpenTheIranianInternet , add them to this thread. I see lots of Manichean comments on Fedi about the #ceasefire, but very few boosts of comments by Iranians on Fedi, and I haven't seen any calls (apart from yours) for the 99% or so Internet blockade to be lifted.

0

4

1

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 9mo ago

Replying to

@ec_euclid@mastodon.social :(((( #RIP #YannickMellier @cosmology@fedigroups.social https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yannick_Mellier

fr.wikipedia.org

0

0

1

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 3mo ago

Replying to

@momo@social.linux.pizza @Alison@beige.party $ time echo "9+7" | bc 16 real 0m0.004s user 0m0.005s sys 0m0.001s $ time echo $((9+7)) 16 real 0m0.000s user 0m0.000s sys 0m0.000s

0

1

0

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 5mo ago

Replying to

@mikro2nd@indieweb.social 1/2 I think the effectiveness in networking, research/public documentation, funding specific actions of most of the specific UN organs [5] is well established: e.g. IAEA, IPCC, UNHCR, UNHRC, UNESCO, ILO, UNDP, and of court decisions: ICJ, is only significantly disputed by authoritarians. They're far from perfect, but highly likely to be beneficial to the global peace/armed conflict ecosystem [6]. They're all part of the UN. [5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:United_Nations [6] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_system_approach_to_peace_and_armed_conflict

en.wikipedia.org

0

2

0

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 5mo ago

Replying to

@Mehrad So if citizens' movements want to go beyond street protests in the next protest session, getting cooperation from Min ITC staff or convincing them to rebel against their heads of departments or having enough senior Min ITC staff defect to the protestors' side or physically taking over the Min ITC building(s) or some combination of these might be a useful #CivilDisobedience goal in order to free the Internet. I'm just thinking aloud - it's not me taking any of the associated risks.

0

0

0

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 5mo ago

Replying to

@mikro2nd@indieweb.social 2/2 "Voicing concern" in itself only plays a small role in public debate. It's the detailed reports from UN agencies based on proper investigations that are much more useful in information space. It's up to the rest of society (NGOs, activist networks, political parties, media, social networks) to curate that information and use it to get decisions made. *Some* UN agencies, like the IMF, WB, WIPO are likely more destructive than constructive, and corporations will oppose any reform.

0

0

0

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 4mo ago

Replying to

@brennen@federation.p1k3.com @brainwane@social.coop Signed. But forcing WMF workers into the arms of the Giga-dollar US corporation #SalesforceInc [1] that runs #Slack [2][3] is extremely unwise, not just as a matter of principle, but also for practical and legal reasons. Better switch to FOSS, which is at the core of the community of WMF wikis, now rather than later. Salesforce Inc's respect for workers' rights doesn't sound great [1]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salesforce [2] https://wikiworkersunited.org/take-action-us [3] https://wikiworkersunited.org/take-action-global

en.wikipedia.org

0

5

0

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 5mo ago

Replying to

@mikro2nd@indieweb.social UN or UNSC? UNSC != UN Redesigning the UNSC [1] to *also* prevent #CrimesAgainstHumanity (CAH; and genocides in non-war contexts) would be a lot better. The Iranian govt crimes against humanity against the #JinaMahsaAmini protestors in 2022 [2][3] and against Iranians in Jan 2026 [4] were *not* during a war. Other parts of the UN *do* generally tend to oppose CAH+war. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reform_of_the_United_Nations_Security_Council [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deaths_during_the_Mahsa_Amini_protests [3] https://docs.un.org/en/a/hrc/55/67 [4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Iran_massacres

en.wikipedia.org

0

2

0

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 4mo ago

Replying to

@brainwane@social.coop @brennen@federation.p1k3.com No need for me to run a server: there's at least one good curated list of matrix servers that are (AFAIK) independent of the Element Creations/Element Software organisation(s): https://servers.joinmatrix.org I'm not a WMF employee, but like many many other people I contribute to the WMF wikis and wiki community.

servers.joinmatrix.org

Public Matrix Homeserver List

Find a public homeserver to sign up for Matrix!

0

3

0

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 6mo ago

Replying to

@oatmeal I'm not an expert on Arendt, and I just noticed the same thing while browsing the Wikipedia article about her. She's not the first major intellectual in history to have a significant ethical flaw.

0

1

0

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 6mo ago

Replying to

@kolya @existentialcomics We'll better know about how the Iranians are fighting to restore their civilisation if we help build up pressure to #OpenTheIranianInternet : https://www.daadkhast.org/en/petition/6360

0

0

0

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 4mo ago

Replying to

@brennen@federation.p1k3.com @brainwane@social.coop A few quotes from [1]: "In October 2025, Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff declared his avid support of Donald Trump and urged him to deploy the National Guard to San Francisco ... That same month, Salesforce pitched the Trump administration on ways that Salesforce's AI tools could help Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) triple its staff to support the administration's mass deportation campaign. ..."

0

4

0

0

Boud @boud@framapiaf.org

· 6mo ago

Replying to

@decidim@freeradical.zone Decidim's announcement has a full English version [1]. "Democratic infrastructure cannot be proprietary: A statement on #OpenSourcePolitics' acquisition" "... we wish to express our concern regarding #OSP’s decision to abandon the principles of transparency and openness inherent in free/libre open-source software (FLOSS). It is important to clarify that #GoVocal is proprietary-closed software; it is not even Open Core, as they once tried to claim." [1] https://decidim.org/blog/2026-04-07-nos-infrastructures-democratiques-ne-peuvent-pas-etre-proprietaires-a-propos-de-l-acquisition-d-open-source-politics

0

0

0

0