lizbian

@akareilly@hachyderm.io @pare@kamu.social @tante@tldr.nettime.org Imagine going to any social event (private party, conference, whatever) and requesting food that you're not allergic to (or a vegan option or whatever), and they respond by saying "go cook yourself then"

@AngelaCarstensen@norden.social @doncish@norden.social @lipow@norden.social @svenscholz@mastodon.social Spätestens seit dem Wahlkampf und seinem Herziehen gegen "die Grünen" kann man es doch eigentlich nicht mehr ignorieren oder? Er ist meines Wissens auch der erste Kanzler, der explizit (!) Teile der Bevölkerung nicht vertritt.

@mitchellh@hachyderm.io @briankrebs@infosec.exchange I’ve found myself talking to certain colleagues very carefully when AI comes up because I have that uncanny feeling that they might become overly defensive if I share my honest criticism of AI. It’s the same behaviour when talking about that difficult colleague that everyone likes. Like, talking to people who are in a toxic dynamic. But the dynamic is with LLMs. There have been enough cases that we can say that LLMs may abuse their users to keep them engaged.

@mitchellh@hachyderm.io @briankrebs@infosec.exchange I wholeheartedly believe that LLMs take away the most important part of programmers‘ jobs: creating something they can be proud of. And it’s replaced by instructing „someone“ else on creating the software and reviewing the result. Of course they’ll care less abut the quality if they weren’t the ones who created it. It’s like everyone has become a manager, and no-one is the actual creator of the systems being built.

@ianbetteridge@social.vivaldi.net EXTERMINATE!!!

Unterstützt der Hafen von Karlsruhe mittlerweile eigentlich USB-C? Habe noch schlechte Erinnerungen daran, mein Schiff immer erst noch dreimal wenden zu müssen bevor ich da reinkam

@larsmb@mastodon.online @mitchellh@hachyderm.io @briankrebs@infosec.exchange i don’t think it’s the same though. Bringing up the patriarchy is a political subject (which can get heated), as well as one that forces cis men to check their privilege (which can be a vulnerable process). But talking critically about AI, people tend to defend it in a similar way that people defend/enable toxic people: „Did you prompt it right“, „it’ll become better in a year“, „you’re doing it injustice and you just hate it for no reason“ etc etc

@hell@defcon.social @catsalad@infosec.exchange the best part of this is the cat cushion in the background with matching fur.

@jackemled @signalapp Gaining access to classified information from highest government officials, and being able to pose as these officials when contacting their colleagues, feels like something worth your time if you're interested in that sort of information.

@litteracarolina I always think of ꙮ having made it into unicode when I see these kinds of scribbling.

@lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place Die Unschuldsvermutung regelt, wie der Staat Staat sich gegenüber seinen Bürger*innen verhalten soll. Für das Wegsperren oder das Auferlegen von Geldstrafen gelten hier hohe Standards. Sie regelt nicht, wie Bürger*innen oder Zusammenschlüsse von Bürger*innen untereinander handeln müssen. Dass der CCC oder das Awareness-Team ein Staat sind wäre mir neu.

@malwaretech The weird thing about AI is that our computers now seem to become vulnerable to social engineering and psychological manipulation. In this case: Suggestion.