@0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange I saw the hype around this and couldn't think of anything constructive to say. It's unfortunate that it didn't plagiarize a few thousand lines tiny C bootstrap compiler rather than spewing out a low quality copy of a monster. It's not hard to write a tiny C compiler. I'd trust the output from said tiny C compiler to be correct before I'd trust this thing. But most importantly, of all the things that a pattern replicating machine should be able to replicate, its a tedious repeated pattern set of code (lexers, recursive descent parsers, codegen from AST..) to process a regular language. It doesn't seem to demonstrate any surprising capability, nor any real utility. I'd be more interested (and terrified) to see results from ML learning how to emit machine code that makes the generated code pass the programs unit tests while also getting best benchmark scores... I like horror movies...