Open post Vincent Van Dinsky @vvandinsky@universeodon.com · 28mo ago Replying to @RandomDamage@infosec.exchange @vvandinsky@universeodon.com @rbreich@masto.ai OK, spotted the fool at the table. @RandomDamage@infosec.exchange @rbreich@masto.ai Ad hominem is an admission that you know your argument lacks merit. If you can't attack the idea, attack the person.
Open post Vincent Van Dinsky @vvandinsky@universeodon.com · 28mo ago Replying to @RandomDamage@infosec.exchange @vvandinsky@universeodon.com @rbreich@masto.ai well, for one thing, what kind of fool would vote for someone fairly convicted of election manipulation? @RandomDamage@infosec.exchange @rbreich@masto.ai That's not an enforcement mechanism, try again.
Open post Vincent Van Dinsky @vvandinsky@universeodon.com · 31mo ago Replying to @MxAlba@todon.nl <p>Accurate.</p> @MxAlba@todon.nl Or could be labeled "what the client representative thinks the user needs" and "what the user needs."
Open post Vincent Van Dinsky @vvandinsky@universeodon.com · 28mo ago Replying to @rbreich@masto.ai <p>It shouldn't be harder for someone who's served time and expressed remorse for a single crime to get a fast food job than it is for a remorseless criminal convicted of 34 felonies to ascend to the highest office in the land.</p> @rbreich@masto.ai What would be the mechanism for enforcing that?