This isn’t what I voted for. I voted for this to happen to OTHER people.
Remote
Matt Griffin 
@betamatt@ruby.social
mastodon 4.7.3Doing the Better/Faster thing at Snyk.
Serial startup guy. Rubyist since 2006.
Photo circa 2014.
72 Followers
184 Following
16 Posts
Joined August 28, 2018
Not even a single trans catgirl, which borders on implausible.
Replying to
@molly0xfff@hachyderm.io you left the huge sigh in the audio and I think I agree with the editorial choice
Replying to
@evan the 25th is a more complicated form of impeachment but involves the same Congressional vote so grouping them makes perfect sense.
Replying to
@ricardoharvin @vonslatt ActBlue doesn’t sell or share data. Your beef is with whoever you donated to.
Replying to
@carnage4life@mas.to well, unless you’re @molly0xfff@hachyderm.io and getting paid in schadenfreude
Replying to
@ricardoharvin @vonslatt you’ve invented a definition of data broker which isn’t the common understanding.
But let’s play with it for a moment. You’re saying that NO information about the donation, beyond the money, should be transferred to the campaign? Campaigns should accept anonymous donations? Or the campaign should just not receive your contact information as part of the transaction?
Replying to
@iungomadre @trantion @Tarah yeah, this is where I land. If there’s no extra factor to the password reset then it’s fully redundant.
Replying to
@rands see also: using Claude to talk to Notion which can talk to Slack…. There’s going to be some pretty surprising behaviors emerging from unintentional MCP webs.
Remember to postfix anything Anthropic says with “prior to our upcoming IPO”
Wait, but wasn’t this always how Gmail worked? You get free email, they get to read it all to profile you. At least here you see some value from it. I don’t get the concern.
I think that in the age of AI, it’s important to celebrate _why Day and what programming can mean to us as an art form.
That doesn’t mean AI isn’t useful. It means that the art and the utility of programming aren’t as related as they used to be. This is a natural evolution of all useful things but still a loss to be felt, as practitioners.
Can anyone make heads or tails of the https://local.cloud license? It seems to reduce to "no one can use this."
Anyone using it for anything, and under what terms?
Replying to
@corbet@social.kernel.org unfortunately, the cops probably have it right on this one. You’re destroying evidence.
If it were normal police, the legal answer would be to refuse to answer any questions, including revealing any passwords. You can refuse to give up a code but you can’t refuse biometric data, which most people probably know by now.
Since it’s a border search you basically have no rights. Refusing the passcode is still probably the legal move but they can mess you around a lot.
Replying to
@quixoticgeek@social.v.st @MikeDunnAuthor@kolektiva.social “or their companies” is lifting a lot of weight in a way that kind of undermines the point. Companies make things that others consume. Removing billionaires doesn’t remove that demand.