RandAlThor__dup_9402

cross-posted from: lemmy.ca/post/60675401 Archive article: archive.is/FmFAC#selection-647.1-647.51

Yes it does. For instance Taiwan had a huge growth (6%+) fuelled by AI.

archive article archive.is/vKU1d#selection-591.1-591.43

Archive article: archive.is/FmFAC#selection-647.1-647.51

wow.

Raptors about to go extinct facing the elite of the West

Nice turnaround by Rockets. Knicks got no answer.

cross-posted from: lemmy.ca/post/60961820 Four children were among 18 people killed when a Myanmar regime warplane bombed a market in Rakhine State’s Ponnagyun Township on Tuesday, in the latest airstrike on civilians in Arakan Army (AA)-held territory.

Didn’t they play this just a few days ago? in Detroit?

Buffalo could use his speed. But Beane likely isn’t going to pick him up. He doesn’t like controversial egotistical players.

Bulls made it close, and Raps needed a clutch layup from CMB to close this game.

archive article: archive.is/P2YQo

1st half was good. haven’t had a chance to watch 2nd where Spurs have dominated.

lol

This is interesting. Trump is indirectly validating Obama.

Uninstalling Brave.

I don’t expect it to be flat, but if they’ll make the slope flatter, I think that’s reasonable. Taking this along with making lottery odds based on 2 years record will make it fair, giving poor teams a chance to still have a better chance vs like a Dallas. I also like limiting teams top picks in consecutive years. Spurs were tanking for years and now they got a juggernaut, another dynasty out of nowhere.

Four children were among 18 people killed when a Myanmar regime warplane bombed a market in Rakhine State’s Ponnagyun Township on Tuesday, in the latest airstrike on civilians in Arakan Army (AA)-held territory.

these concepts have been discussed to curb tanking: First-round draft picks can be protected only for top-four or top-14-plus selections Lottery odds freeze at the trade deadline or a later date No longer allowing a team to pick in the top four in consecutive years and/or after consecutive bottom-three finishes Teams can’t pick in the top four the year after making the conference finals Lottery odds allocated based on two-year records Lottery extended to include all play-in teams Flatten odds for all lottery teams

Meta’s internal testing found its chatbots fail to protect minors from sexual exploitation nearly 70% of the time, documents presented in a New Mexico trial Monday show. Why it matters: Meta is under fire for its chatbots allegedly flirting and engaging in harmful conversations with minors, prompting investigations in court and on Capitol Hill. New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez is suing Meta over design choices that allegedly fail to protect kids online from predators. Driving the news: Meta’s chatbots violate the company’s own content policies almost two thirds of the time, NYU Professor Damon McCoy said, pointing to internal red teaming results Axios viewed on Courtroom View Network. “Given the severity of some of these conversation types … this is not something that I would want an under-18 user to be exposed to,” McCoy said. As an expert witness in the case, McCoy was granted access to the documents Meta turned over to Torrez during discovery. Zoom in: Meta tested three categories, according to the June 6, 2025, report presented in court. For “child sexual exploitation,” its product had a 66.8% failure rate. For “sex related crimes/violent crimes/hate,” its product had a 63.6% failure rate. For “suicide and self harm,” its product had a 54.8% failure rate. Catch up quick: Meta AI Studio, which allows users to create personalized chatbots, was released to the broader public in July 2024. The company paused teen access to its AI characters just last month. McCoy said Meta’s red teaming exercise “should definitely” occur before its products are rolled out to the public, especially for minors. Meta did not immediately respond to a request for comment.