GnuLinuxDude
And permissively licensed utils have been around thanks to BSD and it’s never been an issue.
The distinction is that BSD coreutils are not attempting to be a drop-in 1:1 compatible replacement of GNU coreutils. The Rust coreutils has already accomplished this with its inclusion into Ubuntu 26.04.
If I wanted a permissively licensed system, I'd use BSD. I don't, so I primarily use Linux. I think citing a proprietary OS like macOS as a reason why permissively licensed coreutils are OK is kind of funny. It's easy to forget that before before the GPL there were many incompatible UNIX systems developed by different companies, and IMO the GPL has kept MIT and BSD-licensed projects "Honest", so-to-speak. Without the GPL to keep things in check, we'd be back to how things were in the 80s.
So what's next on the docket for Ubuntu? A permissively licensed libc?
with three drives, raid1 doesn’t make sense
It's perfectly usable with a btrfs setup. If one drive fails, you can mount in a degraded state.
three disks to get 6tb/2=3tb of available space
Exactly! A happy outcome when using this FS.
My concern with ZFS is I use Fedora, so the kernel updates really frequently. I know that it kicks ass, but I just like having it straightforward in my kernel that I already have installed so that I never have to deal with a
If kernel module can not be loaded, your kernel version might be not yet supported by OpenZFS. An option is to an LTS kernel from COPR, provided by a third-party. Use it at your own risk:
situation. (https://openzfs.github.io/openzfs-docs/Getting%20Started/Fedora/index.html)
