Chickerino

@yassie_j almost got me, well played

@TechConnectify banger video :3

@denzilferreira@techhub.social @jumianr@mstdn.social @Gargron@mastodon.social this is not a reasonable excuse to remove the freedom that users have to install whatever they want, i would be ok with this if and only if the user was given a clear warning before installing an application and given a choice to do so anyway besides, apps on android are sandboxed, the damage they can cause (notwithstanding any security vulnerabilities) is limited to the permissions that the user gives, if theres any place this would make sense, i dont think its android, especially considering that mallicious apps or just data stealing apps are very common place on the play store anyway

@jwz @gemelen @green thats cursed lmao

@denzilferreira@techhub.social @Gargron@mastodon.social so why dont we do this on windows or linux then, both oses by default dont even have a permissions system and give applications near full access to the device

@denzilferreira@techhub.social @Gargron@mastodon.social thats why i said "near" everything, for example on android you need to give permission for the app to be able to access your files outside of the app container, windows by default lets every app access every file that your user has access to, i think thats a bit stinky

@denzilferreira@techhub.social @Gargron@mastodon.social thats also stinky but for a different reason, unless the user can specifically override this requirement

@microsoft how the fuck does the basic text editing application with no networking capabilities have an RCE vulnerability microsoft what are you on, because i need some of that to become dumber :3